Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Culture

ROYAL RUMBLE! Markle’s Father Is No Longer Walking Her Down The Aisle… Queen Is Pissed!

Tradition means nothing now…

Published

on

This is what happens when someone shady and of lax moral character enters the family.

Kensington Palace has decided that Prince William will be giving away the bride instead of the father after Meghan Markle’s dad and brother weren’t invited to the May 19th wedding.

As is customary in any wedding the bride is given away by any male family member from the bride’s side, which is usually the father. But that won’t be the case for this year’s royal wedding between Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, because neither of the two males in her small family will be at the wedding.

Meghan has a half-brother, Thomas Markle Jr., who last year was accused of putting a gun to his girlfriend’s head during a domestic dispute. And who also can’t seem to keep his mouth shut when talking to the media about Meghan, so he didn’t get an invite.

Meghan’s father also didn’t make the list because according to sources close to her she has said he has become a recluse of late and she is afraid he won’t do well in such a huge gathering. Not to mention the fact that during an interview Harry said Meghan is finally getting the family she never had which couldn’t have made things easier for Meghan’s family.

Through all this family drama and Meghan’s obvious embarrassment of her father and brother, Meghan’s sister, Samatha insists that her father was looking forward to giving away the bride and also giving the customary speech at the wedding.

It’s obvious Meghan is embarrassed by her family and thinks the royal family is better. Can’t blame her for trying to keep her half-brother away, but what’s the crime in being a recluse? Wouldn’t you be if you had a daughter like Meghan? Too bad Princess Diana isn’t around to talk to her about how “caring” the royal family really is.

Via EOnline:

“So much for the honeymoon phase.

It’s barely been a week since Prince Harry and Meghan Markle announced their royal engagement, and already there is a bit of a cloud over the festivities. Post-engagement bliss is supposed to be exactly that: Living in a bit of a dream state while you savor all of the congratulations and kind words, marvel at the shiny new rock that one of you is wearing, and hopefully there are some presents, too. When you’re a member (or member-to-be) of the Royal Family that time also includes the requisite photo opps, media attention and a major upgrade in glam squad.

And Harry and Meghan have all that, sure—her luscious locks are all the evidence we need—but lately some major drama has been threatening to get in the way of all that.

How Meghan Markle Transitioned From Suits Style to a Royal Wardrobe

It started, as most of these familial scandals do, with an exposé in The Daily Mail. One of Markle’s childhood friends not only shared (and in all likelihood sold) a veritable boatload of private photos, covering everything from school plays to family vacations to her first wedding, but gave a revealing—and some would say entirely disloyal—interview. The subject matter ranged from the relatively innocent, like how they became inseparable in elementary school and what it was like to the all-girls private school, to more hurtful revelations like the fact that this friend believes that fame “changed” Meghan. A headline even circulated that the friend “blamed” Markle for the destruction of her first marriage.

To add insult to injury, Markle’s half-sister, Samantha Markle, has been telling anyone and everyone, well, anything and everything they want to know about the future royal. It’s widely known that the two women aren’t close (it’s unknown the last time they even spoke) and it’s worth mentioning that she has plans to release a book called The Diary of Princess Pushy’s Sister, so the timing of these interviews is anything but random. Samantha dished about whether Meghan will ask her father to walk her down the aisle and admitted that the relationship with Harry “created a rift” among the family.

The future princess’ uncle has also welcomed photographers into his home and spoke about the upcoming nuptials—while his comments were decidedly more positive and not at all disparaging, it still represents a phenomenon that all those who experience near-instant fame have endured: When anyone you’ve ever met or spoken to comes out of the woodwork for their own 15 minutes (or 15 seconds) of fame.

Kate Middletonwent through the same thing when she began the public portion of her relationship with Prince William. It started before the engagement was official with the British press dubbing her “Waity Katie,” in reference to her perceived patience in regards to getting the ring. (Perceived being the keyword: There is no evidence to actually suggest that Middleton was sitting around praying for an engagement to save her).

During their courtship, several of Kate’s college friends spoke to the press about what she was like pre-fame and what it was like to watch the future King fall in love with the future Duchess—all without Kate’s blessing, it can be assumed. There were leaked photos of everything from dorm room fun to that infamous lingerie fashion show.

Meghan Markle vs. Kate Middleton: Comparing Their First Royal Engagements

One reason for this woodwork phenomenon is, of course, the attention. But much of the sudden scrutiny that Meghan and Kate were (and are) subjected to take on a disturbingly misogynistic angle. It’s hard to imagine that the love life Princess Charlotte’s future boyfriends will be put up for as much public debate. Much of the negative talking points around Meghan relate back to her first marriage, often failing to recognize that her ex-husband was just as much involved in the divorce as she was.

And, simply to play the devil’s advocate, Prince Harry doesn’t exactly have a squeaky clean background. With his near-constant partying, the Nazi Halloween costume scandal and the shock of the nude photos that resulted from a wild Las Vegas night, he certainly wouldn’t pass muster if he was subjected to the same scrutiny. The press is allowing Markle’s former “friends” to subtly slut-shame her while failing to mention that Harry has been through his fair share of partners.

But the real question during all of this is: Does it even matter? Will the headline-hungry people from Meghan’s past have any bearing on her current happiness? The short answer is no.

After all, despite what her friends and relatives may say to the tabloids, she gets the last laugh and the man of her dreams. Prince Harry is used to this level of scrutiny and by all accounts there is no amount of bad press that could change his mind. He’s shown to be fiercely protective of Markle, starting at his insistence in the palace’s unprecedented statement in defense of Meghan that was issued at the beginning of their public relationship. Given his familiarity with news cycles, there’s a good chance that the future Royal couple haven’t even looked at Google in the last week (and nor should they).

The haters will keep coming, but all they have to do is keep looking forward.”

H/T DailyStar

Culture

Obamas Out For Blood For What Predator Weinstein Did To Malia After They Sent Her Into His Lair

The Obamas released a joint statement, saying they were “disgusted” by the allegations and that “any man who demeans and degrades women needs to be condemned”

Published

on

Former President Barack Obama is about to be out for blood after he found out what happened to his precious daughter Malia when she was with Harvey Weinstein. It didn’t take long after the sick and depraved sexual assault stories came out about Weinstein for Barack Obama to be annoyed enough to go after Weinstein. The ogre-like Weinstein might be in hiding since the rapey stories came out, but he might have to cut a big check or come out of his lair to face the former President and figure out how to fix this big problem that has him in yet another conundrum.

It’s being reported that Harvey Weinstein owes Malia Obama money. While Harvey has been accused of numerous crimes related to sexual assault, this is not one of those crimes. He didn’t steal Malia’s dignity, but he allegedly didn’t pay her for the work she did either. Supposedly Malia was sent to work for Weinstein as an intern and she didn’t get paid. Or, if she did get paid, she wasn’t paid enough or the slimeball owes her money. There’s another huge problem that lies with the accusation of not paying a former President’s daughter. Weinstein apparently owes a lot of people money, but they’re filing for bankruptcy and the people he owes might not ever see a penny of their worth.

Vice reported more on the scandalous situation: “The Weinstein Company finally filed for bankruptcy Monday night, and with it came a massive, 394-page list of organizations and A-list celebrities that the disgraced company still owes money to—including President Obama’s daughter, Malia, USA Today reports.

The documents don’t go into details about how much money is owed to each of the creditors or why, but since Malia Obama interned for the Weinstein Company back in early 2017, only months before Harvey Weinstein’s long history of alleged sexual harassment and assault became global news, it’s likely that she’s still owed some intern wages. On top of working for an alleged monster during her internship last summer, Malia was accosted by a stalker after a guy snuck into the Manhattan building where the 18-year-old was working and proposed to her—and now it looks like she wasn’t even properly paid for the job.

The Obamas released a joint statement speaking out against Weinstein—a former donor—in October, after Malia’s internship had ended, saying they were “disgusted” by the allegations and that “any man who demeans and degrades women in such fashion needs to be condemned and held accountable, regardless of wealth or status.”

Along with the former Weinstein intern, Robert De Niro, Seth Rogen, Jennifer Lawrence, David Bowie, and former close Weinstein associate Quentin Tarantino are also reportedly owed money by the Weinstein Company, as well as dozens of major networks and agencies like CNN, WME, and even VICE.”

Harvey Weinstein was on top of the world. He was rich, he had women even if they were doing it reluctantly, and he probably didn’t have a care in the world. Now he’s probably sitting in a diner crying about free refills of Diet Coke as his company and career fall apart faster than a deck of cards smacked over by an inglorious bastard. One might think a guy with that much success and money would be a bit smarter about the women he courts or convinces into sexual relations. Then again, half of the women were guilty too. It should be said that there’s a good amount of women who probably knew Harvey Weinstein could be tricked into giving bad actresses roles in movies. How many women willingly went to Harvey Weinstein, did sexual things with him, and knew that they would get a career out of it? I know who. Every woman who claimed Harvey molested them 20 years later were probably the women who used him. They saw a big rich ugly man who could get them cast in a movie and they used their body to get a role and have a career.

If any of the women who accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault actually were raped or assaulted, then they should’ve said something when it happened. Instead, they enjoyed a life having a career. Why? Because they were just as guilty as he was.

Now Obama has to go after the big flailing bankrupt sexual assault participant and gather take the guys money to pay his daughter. Malia wanted an internship and experience, not to be ripped off by some overweight guy who trades sexual favors with Hollywood celebrities.

What’s next for the former President? Is he going after Harvey? Will he send his guys over to cash some checks? Will Malia handle it on her own and ruin everything that’s left of Harvey’s existence?

Seems like Harvey Weinstein and his legacy in Hollywood are over. There’s literally nothing he can do now besides serve coffee at Starbucks, but they might require a background check and I’m not sure Harvey would pass.

This is all just my opinion though. What do you think about the situation with Malia and Harvey? Tell us in the comments below and share to social media with your friends.

Continue Reading

Culture

PISSED OFF Rosie Tells Cowardly Paul Ryan Exactly Where He’s Going When He Retires!

Rosie came out of nowhere and assaulted Paul Ryan for what he just announced.

Published

on

Rosie O’Donnell and President Donald Trump have a really strange feud that’s been going on for years. She has now decided to take her vile rhetoric to the retiring House Speaker Paul Ryan. She has stated that Ryan is going straight to hell now that he’s leaving Congress.

Why does the far left need to be like this? Why can’t they just sit back and work towards winning elections like the right did during Obama’s eight years in office? Instead, they have to resort to name calling, telling people to die or to go straight to hell. This is not how civil discourse is supposed to be and it shouldn’t be tolerated by either side of the political aisle. If Rosie needs help someone from her family should step up and get her that help. It’s not safe for someone who has so much hate inside to be walking the streets alone.

Rosie isn’t the only one in Hollywood who needs help as explained via The Daily Beast:

“On Friday morning, President Trump partook in one of his favorite rituals this side of hitting the links or avoiding Tiffany: a bill signing. The commander-in-chief, surrounded by ornamental backers, inked the Veterans Affairs Reform Act—a measure that will make it easier to terminate VA employees—before soaking up camera flashes and cabinet applause. Among the admiring spectators was Al Baldasaro, a military veteran and New Hampshire state representative. The presence of Baldasaro, who introduced candidate Trump at a number of campaign stops and served as his adviser on veterans issues, would be unremarkable were it not for the fact that he once called for Hillary Clinton to be killed.

“This whole thing disgusts me. Hillary Clinton should be put in the firing line and shot for treason,” said Baldasaro. He was discussing Benghazi, a tragedy wherein the Republican House found no evidence of wrongdoing on Clinton’s behalf, during a July 2016 radio interview. The incendiary remarks triggered a secret service probe, but Baldasaro never received any significant repercussions. And Baldasaro’s cameo at Trump’s recent bill signing received precious little coverage on cable news. You see, they were too busy upbraiding Johnny Depp.

Depp attracted the ire of the news media for disgusting comments he made about the President at England’s Glastonbury Festival Thursday evening. “Can we bring Trump here?” Depp asked the crowd. “When was the last time an actor assassinated a president?” The Pirates of the Caribbean star was, of course, referencing John Wilkes Booth’s assassination of President Lincoln. He added, “I want to clarify: I’m not an actor. I lie for a living. However, it’s been a while. And maybe it’s time.”

The actor’s incredibly poor—reprehensible, really—attempt at humor received swift condemnation from the White House, which responded with the following statement: “President Trump has condemned violence in all forms and it’s sad that others like Johnny Depp have not followed his lead. I hope that some of Mr. Depp’s colleagues will speak out against this type of rhetoric as strongly as they would if his comments were directed to a Democrat elected official.” The Depp imbroglio also, as expected, sent right-wing media into a tizzy, with everyone from Fox News and Breitbart to Rush Limbaugh tying Depp to a Shakespeare in the Park production of Julius Caesar featuring a Trump-like protagonist; a photo of Kathy Griffin posing with a severed mannequin head of Trump; Madonna’s idiotic women’s march crack about how she’s “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House”; and lastly, the shooting of Republican Congressman Steve Scalise by an unhinged Bernie Sanders supporter.

There is causality, some on the right are arguing, between the antics of Depp, the Caesar play, Griffin, and Madonna and acts of violence perpetrated against those on the right, such as the recent shooting of Rep. Scalise—a baseless claim, given that there is no evidence the shooter was influenced by any of these factors. There is also the idea that these celebrity outliers represent not only the views of Hollywood as a whole, but the base of the Democratic Party.

Let’s talk Hollywood for a second. The notion that Johnny Depp, Kathy Griffin or Madonna—or really any celebrity with significant name recognition—somehow speaks for the entire industry is absurd. According to the 2016 Otis Report on the Creative Economy of California, the entertainment industry there employs some 166,300 people. Meanwhile, the Bureau of Labor Statistic reported that, as of May 2016, there are 48,620 actors employed nationwide—including 14,840 in California. The vast majority of these actors are struggling, working multiple jobs to pay the bills. And a great many of them were not born in California to wealth, but migrated there from different parts of the country. Johnny Depp, for example, grew up poor in Owensboro, Kentucky. The average crew size for a Hollywood film production, meanwhile, comes out to around 600 people (Marvel’s The Avengers had 2,718), and most of these crew members have jobs like key grip, security, catering, low-level assistant, etc. Not exactly the “elite.”

All of this does not excuse what Depp, Griffin, and Madonna said or did. Those actions deserve widespread condemnation (Depp deserves far greater scorn for other reasons, although that’s a different story). If these Hollywood liberals want to truly make a difference—that is, make any sort of dent in 2018—then they need to realize they’re easy targets, knock off the outrageous antics, and stick to the issues. If liberals, in general, want to start winning elections again, then they must start holding things like Trump’s Baldasaro and Nugent visits to account. Otherwise, the Democrats have about as much chance of succeeding as Johnny Depp’s next movie.”

Can anyone imagine the outrage there would have been if a right-wing actor, such as Clint Eastwood, Tom Selleck or Adam Baldwin would have called for the assassination of a sitting Democrat president? Or would have posed with a severed head of Barack Hussein Obama? The left would have gone berzerk and the actors would have lost any chance of ever working again. But let’s be honest, the right doesn’t do that if they even get close to attacking a left-wing president the left start crying bloody hell and the sponsors start getting the call for boycotts. But we know the drill, the left does whatever they want because they “mean well.”

Continue Reading

Culture

Miley Cyrus Who Left US Over Trump Is Back And Now Taking Over Politics Because America ‘Needs Her’

She gets destroyed by her own wrecking ball every time she speaks about real-world issues in American politics.

Published

on

Miley Cyrus is back and trying to take over politics as she runs her mouth and thinks out loud that America ‘needs her.’ Most people aren’t bothered by her celebrity shock value antics and most people also don’t need her in regards to politics. Celebrities, reality stars, musicians, and other entertainment people continue stepping out of their realm and voicing their opinion about politics as if they’re the most important people on the planet. It must be their coverup to all the times they sexually assault each other like they’re a bunch of Harvey Weinstein followers, but for some reason, they just keep thinking they’re important and they’re not.

Miley Cyrus swings large male genitalia at people and barely wears clothes, presenting herself as a scantily clad and promiscuous acting performer on stage possibly thinks that people take her serious when she’s talking about politics. They don’t. She might be able to belt out a well-written song holding a tune like no other, but she gets destroyed by her own wrecking ball every time she speaks about real-world issues in American politics. She’s an entertainer, not a lawmaker, and she’s challenging the people who actually do adult things like make the real laws and it’s just another gimmick in her handbag of tricks. She’s targeting conservatives and suggesting that they shouldn’t be able to make the laws, even though conservatives build their regime on morals and common sense opposed to feelings and no sense (fake genders) and also no cents (socialism).

If Trump winning the election forced her out of the United States (so she can pretend to take a role somewhere else), then that’s fine. It’s her choice to live somewhere, but don’t come around here knocking on walls like she’s the boss of the country. She’s just an entertainer and has no true value in regards to how America runs.

Are we really listening to THIS when it comes to laws and politics?

Another website had a lot to say about her: “In a recent interview with Paper magazine, Cyrus, who appears nude within the publication, refers to herself as the “least judgemental person ever.” However, the magazine notes that while she was raised in a Christian home and was baptized in a Southern Baptist church, the “Wrecking Ball” singer “maintains a particular contempt for fundamentalist lawmakers who rally against this sort of progressive, potentially life-saving changes for the LGBT community.” “Those people shouldn’t get to make our laws,” Cyrus said of Christians who hold to a traditional view of marriage.

The 22-year-old “Party in the USA” singer went on to slam Christians who believe Noah’s Ark was a real vessel: “That’s f***ing insane,” she told the magazine. “We’ve outgrown that fairy tale, like we’ve outgrown f***ing Santa and the tooth fairy.” The former Disney Channel star also criticized her parent’s political views, calling them “conservative-ass mother-f***ers.” Cyrus revealed that she views her gender identity as “fluid,” and told her mother that she was attracted to women when she was just 14 years old.

The way I see it, she is just another know-it-all spoiled brat. She ought to get together with Justin Bieber, they would make a good couple. Oh, that’s right, she’s not attracted to the opposite sex. Give her a one-way ticket out of this country, because she’s had such a terrible life and gained so much life experience at the ripe old age of 22.

It’s really sad to believe that not long ago, she was a sweet, pretty little girl. She has went from that to whatever she is now. In my opinion, Miley will be the next Amy Winehouse, she’s on a rapid downward spiral, and her father, Clueless Billy Ray Cyrus, will have been as much a contributor as Amy’s father was. “Honey you don’t need rehab”. I guess if you love power and fame, no cost is too high. Just look at the Clintons.”

Here is Miley Cyrus again using a male genitalia in her show, but then really wants us to listen to her talk about lawmakers as if anyone takes her seriously. Not gonna happen. Or maybe we will listen. Perhaps her show is one big gimmick to sell tickets and if that’s the case, then she’s doing a great job. However, what is her experience in lawmaking and politics? Does she have any? Trump didn’t have any either, but he has a business background which is working so far in regards to to American economy.

How will wearing a penis-nose help America? Comic relief is always welcome at a time when a division in our population is constantly perpetrated by hardcore leftists. If everyone on the left protested with a penis nose, then maybe someone might take them as seriously as they take Miley Cyrus.

She should stick to singing and shocking people at her shows.  She’s doing just fine there, and the political world isn’t interested.

What if Miley Cyrus ran for President? Would that be funny? Share with your friends to show them the funny Miley videos!

Continue Reading

Trending